Essentially the most damning factor about “Scream 7” isn’t that it’s unhealthy. Horror franchises survive lackluster installments on a regular basis. What makes the seventh Ghostface thriller uniquely dispiriting is how brazenly afraid it’s of its personal historical past, viewers, studio, and launch. Marketed as a triumphant return to type and positioned as a nostalgic corrective transfer for Paramount after a yr of public controversydirector Kevin Williamson’s newest lands like a company gesture that misunderstands each the franchise he created and the horror panorama it inhabits now.
Even measured towards different high-stakes slasher motion pictures, “Scream 7” is popping out underneath uncommon scrutiny. After the final sequel proved the collection might survive with out its unique remaining lady, Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbellwho handed on that movie over a reported pay dispute), “Scream 7” brings her again anyway in a determined try and distract followers from, sure, the continued battle in Gaza. Followers gathered exterior the world premiere in Los Angeles to protest the contentious dismissal of “Scream 6” star Melissa Barrera, who was eliminated after posting pro-Palestinian feedback on social media.
However dear reassurance can smother satire, and that’s a key component each “Scream” and Williamson’s profession as soon as thrived on. What the director delivers right here, after writing the unique movie and two sequels (“Scream 2,” “Scream 4”), is a poorly constructed story that confuses reverence for relevance and repetition for perception. Co-written with Man Busick from a narrative by Busick and James Vanderbilt, who did much better writing the final two “Scream” chapters, the script Williamson wound up is easy to the purpose of stultification — and Sidney isn’t silly.
Disgraced right here however as soon as nice, the beloved scream queen comes again to her franchise by means of a brand new small city referred to as Pine Grove. She’s relocated there together with her dorky cop husband (Joel McHale) to boost their teenage daughter, Tatum (Isabel Could), hoping to cozy as much as some domesticated calm after a long time of hack-and-slash trauma. However when a brand new Ghostface begins focusing on the youthful era, previous allies from Woodsboro drift again into orbit, and the equipment of the “Scream” whodunit lurches ahead like a contractual obligation.
From the beginning, this new setting seems like a generic placeholder fairly than the enduring New York Metropolis panorama of “Scream 6” — or the lived-in haunted-house impact of different style movies. Characters transfer between areas (espresso store, highschool theater, bar, espresso store!) by means of a maze of varied cookie-cutter properties that lack spatial logic and narrative reminiscence. The place Woodsboro functioned as a personality in its personal proper as a cursed world formed by winking violence and cyclical paranoia, “Scream 7” finds an incoherent community of dimly lit units. The geography doesn’t construct stress, and the clues undergo in consequence. When deaths happen, they don’t ripple outward a lot as disappear into the gloom.
The ensemble, peppered with shock cameos, doesn’t assist a lot. Contemporary faces seem as sketches fairly than folks as “Scream 7” populates with a chatty neighbor (Anna Camp), her true crime-obsessed son (Asa Germann), a bitchy drama instructor (Timothy Simons, amusing however underused), an instantly suspicious boyfriend for Tatum (Sam Rechner), and extra of the teenager lady’s friends (McKenna Grace, Celeste O’Connor). The connective tissue between characters who ought to already know one another feels strained, and the arrival of fan favourite Gale Weathers (Courteney Cox) and scene-stealing siblings Mindy (Jasmin Savoy Brown) and Chad Meeks-Martin (Mason Gooding) underlines how little chemistry exists in these new searching grounds. The seams of a pricey rewrite are apparent, however worse than its messiness is its odd indifference to emotion. You’ll wrestle to recollect who died, not to mention care about who did it.
Sidney herself is the clearest image of the movie’s confusion, regardless of Campbell’s efforts. “Scream 7” gestures towards the well-worn trope of therapy-informed parenting, however can’t discover something worthwhile or humorous sufficient to say concerning the topic. Scenes meant to convey fondness and dramatic weight as an alternative flatten into inconsiderate repetition, because the collection’ decades-long dissection of the ultimate lady reveals itself as a stale model asset.
That hollowness extends to lots of the performing performances. The forged is caught with materials so lifeless it borders on punitive. Deadpan strains land sporadically at greatest, and the friction between Sidney and her daughter by no means sparks. Relatively than evolving the franchise’s teen archetypes, “Scream 7” barely sketches the floor and leaves Sidney principally stranded in that desert.
Technically talking, the film is simply competent sufficient to be irritating. The cinematography does its job, however the modifying lacks chew, and the sound design is actively disorienting. Musical cues swing wildly from choral eeriness to lifeless silence to pulsing synths with none discernible logic, often robbing scenes of rhythm and dread. The violence follows swimsuit. After a brutal and strong opening, Ghostface settles into monotony. Weapons seem with out creativeness, surprises blur collectively, and the staging feels missing in primary conviction.
Staged inside the unique Macher home (now reimagined as a true-crime walkthrough attraction), the chilly open is the one a part of “Scream 7” that hints at what it might have been. The thought of “actual” Ghostface followers actually strolling by means of the primary film’s climactic scene is sensible, and the actors (Jimmy Tatro, Michelle Randolph) promote it with real presence. It’s the one time the place “Scream” historical past is interrogated fairly than worshipped, however the ill-advised saga by no means reaches that stage once more.
Williamson’s biggest failure comes within the movie’s relationship to meta-commentary. As soon as the collection’ calling card, self-awareness has right here been dulled into self-soothing. “Scream 7” behaves as if the defining nervousness of contemporary horror is craving for the “good previous days,” ignoring a style and viewers that’s presently energized by inventive threat, daring reinvention, and tangible day by day concern. In a cinematic panorama the place interval vampire epics (“Sinners”) and microbudget online game experiments (“Iron Lung”) can coexist as status style fare, this retreat feels particularly out of contact.
“Scream 7” refuses to joke about itself, and that’s an unwise alternative for a franchise constructed on confrontation. The nervousness of studio oversight is palpable, however that doesn’t imply Williamson and his co-writers have been proper to desert their obligation to impress. This seems like a film made by artists afraid of their employers as a lot as their shoppers and not sure which group would possibly activate them first.
Nostalgia, in the long run, isn’t this sequel’s theme however its protect. It doesn’t erase the franchise’s highs, however however stains the canon with a fraught manufacturing nightmare that can be remembered as pointless. Horror can’t work with out bravery, on and off display. However “Scream 7” mistook security for survival, and in doing so, coughed up the least harmful Ghostface but.
Grade: D+
From Paramount Photos, “Scream 7” is in theaters on February 27.
Wish to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie evaluations and important ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched publication, In Evaluate by David Ehrlich, during which our Chief Movie Critic and Head Critiques Editor rounds up the very best new evaluations and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely accessible to subscribers.