Miller-Howard Q2 2025 Quarterly Report


Stock Market Candle Chart on Digital Grid Background

sankai

Will Megacaps Outperform Forever?

Over the past 10 years, investors have witnessed unprecedented outperformance from companies with the largest market capitalizations (“megacaps”). The biggest have become even bigger, while the vast majority of companies in the S&P 500 Index (SP500, SPX) have underperformed. By weight, the top 10 megacap companies accounted for 18% of the S&P 500 at the end of 2014, growing to a record 39% at the end of last year. We have seen a slight easing of the trend this year, with the top 10 megacap companies representing 37% of the S&P 500 at the end of the second quarter of 2025. It’s unclear whether investors have finally cooled on the megacaps or if this is just a short-term reversal. We remain confident that market performance will eventually broaden, particularly given the extreme valuation spread-the trailing price/earnings (P/E) multiple for the top 10 market cap companies at the beginning of the year was 29.3x versus 24.4 x for the S&P 500 as of quarter-end. The performance skew towards the largest companies has made it difficult for the total returns of highyield dividend stocks to keep up with broad market averages. Over the past 75 years, high-yield dividend stocks have had an average annual return of 12.8% versus 11.5% for the S&P 500, but the story has been different over the past 10 years. Logically, it would be possible to find high-yield dividend stocks among the megacaps, but the reality is that recent P/E ratios are too lofty for almost all of the top 10 megacaps to pay a high, well-covered dividend. Looking at these companies at the end of 2024, none of them had a dividend yield above 1%.

Market Concentration at Record Level: Top 10 as a Percent of the S&P 500 Index

Market Concentration at Record Level: Top 10 as a Percent of the S&P 500 Index

The investment portfolios described herein are those of Miller/Howard Investments. These materials are being provided for illustrative and informational purposes only. The information contained herein is obtained from multiple sources that are believed to be reliable. However, such information has not been verified, and may be different from the information included in documents and materials created by the sponsor firm in whose investment program a client participates. Some sponsor firms may require that these Miller/Howard Investments materials are preceded or accompanied by investment profiles or other documents or materials prepared by such sponsor firms, which will be provided upon a client’s request. For additional information, documents and/or materials, please speak to your Financial Advisor.

Megacaps: Big Buybacks, Small Dividends

Megacaps: Big Buybacks, Small Dividends

The outperformance of megacaps has been driven, at least in part, by their massive stock buybacks in recent years. Buybacks at the top 10 market cap companies used to be fairly close to dividends and in line with the overall market. Changes in corporate tax rates prompted an increase in buybacks for the overall market in 2018, but unlike the rest of the S&P 500, the megacaps have kept their foot on the buyback accelerator. As we have discussed in our past quarterly reports, both buybacks and dividends can help boost total equity returns. As investors ponder the uncertain environment, a key question is: What is more likely to grow going forward, dividends or buybacks? The question is critical because the market-leading megacaps are devoting big dollars to buybacks and relatively small sums to dividends.

Every company has its own story, so we structured our analysis on a same-company basis, looking at the growth in dollars spent on dividends and buybacks for every company in the S&P 500 over the past 30 years (roughly 15,000 observations). Over these tumultuous 30 years, companies raised their dividends by over 2% on average. Perhaps more impressively, trailing dividends were highly predictive of the next year’s dividend with roughly 95% of the variance explained. In contrast, same-company buybacks dropped by 5% on average over the same period with much less ofthe variance explained. In other words, when considering a stock investment, knowing the trailing dividends can be much more informative than know-ing the buyback history.

dividends and buybacks

Solid Dividend and Buyback Growth in 2024

Solid Dividend and Buyback Growth in 2024

Dividend vs. Buyback Growth in Good Times and Bad

Pooling data across 30 years gives us a good estimate of the average same-company growth of dividends versus buybacks, but it masks just how different the growth rates can be in good versus bad years. Last year was a better-than-average year for both dividend and buyback growth. On average, companies raised the dollars devoted to dividends and buybacks by 5% and 13%, respectively.

In contrast, same-company dividends fell by 23% in 2009. The chart shows that many companies raised their dividends in 2009, but there were some huge reductions that pulled average growth down. Same-company buybacks fell by 53% in 2009—evidence that management teams are more likely to cut buybacks than dividends in challenging times.

Global Financial Crisis Hit Dividend and Buyback Growth in 2009

Global Financial Crisis Hit Dividend and Buyback Growth in 2009

Dividend Growth Tends To Be Steadier Than Buybacks

Average Same-Company Growth

Dividend Growth Tends To Be Steadier Than Buybacks

Over the past 30 years, same-company growth rates for dividends have varied in a predictable manner, with growth going negative in 2001 following the Tech Bubble burst, in 2008-10 concurrent with the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), and in 2020 during the pandemic. For the other 25 years, same-company dividend growth was positive. Dividend growth fluctuated, but it was reasonably stable (other than during the GFC period).

In contrast, same-company buybacks not only shrank in most years, but they also gyrated tremendously. Some of the peaks and valleys are easily explainable, but many are head-scratchers. For example, same-company buybacks dropped by 31% in 2013, despite a growing economy and a booming stock market. In that same year, same-company dividends grew by 3%. Our overall conclusion is that buybacks are not terribly predictable.

At Miller/Howard, we have long argued that dividends are a clear signal that:

  • The company is run for the benefit of shareholders. Public companies are run by executives who are strangers to the average investor and must earn investors’ trust. A dividend is a commitment by management to run the firm quarter-after-quarter with shareholder cash return as a priority.
  • Management has confidence in the future profitability of their company. While management statements should be treated with appropriate skepticism, executives know more about their business than shareholders do. By committing to a regular dividend, management is using more than just words to signal that they expect their business to be resilient, even in a changing environment.

The outlook for the economy continues to be highly uncertain. Corporate earnings were ahead of expectations in the first quarter of 2025, leading to a rebound in equity values. Yet tariffs remain both high and uncertain, and the full impact may not hit until the second half of 2025. Adding to uncertainty is the prospect for continued military conflict in the Middle East. In our view, this is not the time to chase expensive, megacap stocks, particularly given their reliance on buybacks.

Total returns for stocks can be decomposed into three parts: dividends, earnings growth, and price/earnings multiple expansion (see Miller/Howard’s 1Q 2021 Quarterly Report). The total returns, for high-yield dividend stocks, are skewed more towards dividend income than the broad market. Our view is that tilting towards dividends allows investors to benefit both from a lower-volatility source of returns as well as the strong tendency for dividends to rise over time.

Tough Environment for Stockpickers

S&P 500 Index: Percent of Members That Outperformed by Calendar Year

S&P 500 Index: Percent of Members That Outperformed by Calendar Year

Decades ago, an academic economist, Burton Malkiel, asserted that choosing stocks randomly had just as good of a chance of beating the broad market as professional stock-pickers. Portfolio managers with track records of beating benchmarks disagreed, but then came the real twist of the knife-in 2013, David Harding, a famous quant researcher, pointed out that stocks chosen at random had a better than 50/50 chance of beating the market. The reason given was that value stocks and small caps generally outperform over time. Anyone who began following the stock market in the last 10 years will find that statement puzzling given that large, expensive stocks have decisively outperformed the S&P 500 Index in the most recent decade. The easiest way to illustrate the disconnect between recent outperformance by larger cap stocks versus smaller cap is to compare returns of capitalization-weighted stocks with equal-weighted stocks-same stocks, different weights. When performance tilts towards the larger caps, the cap-weighted index outperforms, as it has in the past 10 years. However, looking at 5 -year periods, the equal-weighted group typically outperforms-meaning that the norm has been the largest capitalization stocks underperforming in most historical periods going back to 1930. The recent run in large cap stocks has meant that most stocks have underperformed the S&P 500. In both 2023 and 2024, less than 30% of stocks beat the cap-weighted index, hardly a good environment for stockpicking. As Stein’s Law states, “If it cannot go on forever, it will stop.” In our view, this applies to the ongoing outperformance of the megacaps. We believe that the performance bias towards large cap stocks will subside or even swing back to the historical norm of smaller cap stocks outperforming. High valuations and low dividend yields make the current crop of megacaps unappealing to dividend investors. Once total returns broaden, we would expect dividend-focused portfolios to perform well against the S&P 500.

Smaller Cap Stocks Tend to Outperform

5-Year Annualized Return Difference: Equal minus Market Cap Weighted

5-Year Annualized Return Difference: Equal minus Market Cap Weighted

Miller/Howard Investments Inc. is an independent, research-driven investment boutique with over three decades of experience managing portfolios for major institutions and individuals in dividend-focused investment portfolios. The firm is 100% employee-owned through an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). We continue to evolve and develop portfolios that strive to provide investors with various levels of current income and dividend growth. With a primary goal of reliable income and long-term returns, supported by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) research and/or screening, direct engagement with companies, filing shareholder resolutions, proxy voting, coalition building, and/or public policy involvement. This report represents Miller/Howard Investments’views. The statistics and projections cited in this report have been provided by sources generally considered to be reliable, but are not guaranteed. Opinions and estimates offered constitute Miller/Howard Investments’judgment and are subject to change without notice, as are statements of financial market trends, which are based on current market conditions. This material is solely informational. The information and analyses contained herein are not intended as tax, legal, or investment advice and may not be appropriate for your specific circumstances; accordingly, you should consult your own tax, legal, investment, or other advisors, at both the outset of any transaction and on an ongoing basis, to determine such appropriateness. The material may also contain forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty, and there is no guarantee they will come to pass. Any investment returns-past, hypothetical, or otherwise-are not indicative of future performance. The information provided should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and should not be considered investment, legal, or tax advice. Securities mentioned are being shown for informational purposes only. Buy and sell rationales are the express opinions of MHI’s investment team. These securities should not be considered a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any of the securities and are not intended to imply that any one security listed above, or the portfolio as a whole, is appropriate for a particular client. There is no assurance that the securities purchased have remained or will remain in the portfolio or that securities sold have not been or will not be repurchased. To receive a list of all recommendations for the previous year, please email compliance@mhinvest.com. Common stocks do not assure dividend payments. Dividends are paid only when declared by an issuer’s board of directors, and the amount of any dividend may vary over time. Dividend yield is one component of performance and should not be the only consideration for investment. The returns on a portfolio that utilizes environmental, social, or governance (ESG) criteria for stock selection may be lower or higher than portfolios where ESG factors are not considered, and the investment opportunities available to such portfolios may differ. DEFINITIONS: Inflation is the year-over-year change of the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI Index). Price-Earnings Ratio (P/E)-The ratio of a company’s share price to its earnings per share. The ratio is used as a valuation tool and can help determine whether a company is overvalued or undervalued. EBITDA = earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Free cash flow is cash flow from operations minus capital spending. It’s the cash flow available: to return to shareholders through dividends or buybacks; for M&A; to save as cash on the balance sheet; or to pay down debt. MLP = Master Limited Partnership. S&P 500 Index widely regarded as the best single gauge of large-cap US equities and serves as the foundation for a wide range of investment products. The Index includes 500 leading companies and captures approximately 80% coverage of available market capitalization. Russell 1000 Index measures the performance of the large-cap segment of the US equity universe. It is a subset of the Russell 3000 Index and includes approximately 1,000 of the largest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Russell 1000 Index represents approximately 92% of market capitalization of the US market. Russell 1000 Value Index offers investors access to the broad value segment of US equity value universe and is constructed to provide a comprehensive and unbiased barometer of the broad value market.


Original Post

Editor’s Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.



Source link

Leave a Comment

Discover more from Education for All

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading