(Bloomberg) — A choose dismissed a long-running authorized problem towards Santos Ltd., which had accused the Australian oil and fuel producer of deceptive buyers over its local weather technique.
The case introduced by the Australasian Centre for Company Duty, a shareholder advocacy group, was rejected Tuesday by Justice Brigitte Markovic. Markovic will publish particulars of her determination Feb. 23, she advised the Federal Court docket of Australia listening to in Sydney.
Adelaide-based Santos was first sued in 2021 by the group, which had alleged the corporate was misleading in portraying itself as a clear power producer in investor supplies and by suggesting it had a “clear and credible” plan to hit internet zero by 2040.
ACCR additionally contested the corporate’s description of pure fuel as a clear gasoline — a serious level of rivalry amongst local weather activists. The case was the primary of its kind to legally problem the validity of an organization’s plan to succeed in internet zero, in response to the group.
Santos and the ACCR didn’t instantly reply to requests for touch upon the case.
Litigation associated to so-called green-washing continued to increase in 2025, with courts more and more supporting motion to make sure firms current particular and verifiable plans for his or her claims about tackling international warming, in response to a December report by Columbia Legislation Faculty’s Sabin Heart for Local weather Change Legislation.
Power producer TotalEnergies SE was rebuked by a Paris court docket in October after a choose dominated a company rebrand had misled customers over its commitments on local weather motion. In Might, CLP Holdings Ltd.’s EnergyAustralia settled with an advocacy group that had mounted a case associated to the advertising and marketing of carbon offsets.
Extra tales like this can be found on bloomberg.com