This week on Legally UsRachael Bennett, licensed household regulation specialist and senior lawyer for Sullivan Legislation & Associatesbreaks down whether or not Haley Kalil has a sound argument to dismiss her ex Matt Kalil’s lawsuit in opposition to her following feedback she made about his penis measurement.
On January 27, Haley, 33, requested the court docket for the invasion of privateness and unjust enrichment lawsuit to be thrown out attributable to her First Modification proper.
“Individuals hear ‘First Modification’ and assume it’s a defend for something you say. It’s actually not,” Bennett, who will not be affiliated with the case, solely tells Us Weekly. “The Structure protects opinions and speech on issues of public concern, but it surely doesn’t robotically shield broadcasting intimate particulars a couple of former partner’s anatomy to the web.”
She provides, “Even when what she mentioned is true, the query is whether or not these particulars had been personal, extremely private, and shared with out consent. In the event that they had been, that may help an invasion of privateness declare, and reality doesn’t essentially present her immunity right here.”
The court docket docs said, “Plaintiff’s Criticism seeks to carry a girl within the public eye civilly answerable for offering a truthful, autobiographical account of sexual trauma she suffered and described as having led to the tip of a extremely publicized movie star marriage with an NFL soccer star.”
Haley’s lawyer argued that permitting the case to proceed would “require this Courtroom to radically broaden state-law causes of motion past their acknowledged boundaries into territory fiercely protected by the First Modification.”
Haley was married to Matt, 36, from 2015 to 2022. Three years after their break up, Haley spoke about her previous marriage in a November 2025 livestream the place she claimed that the measurement of Matt’s penis was corresponding to “two Coke (cans) stacked on prime of one another” or “possibly even a 3rd,” making bodily intimacy “unattainable.”

Matt’s lawyer Ryan Saba mentioned in a press release to Us“Haley Kalil’s movement to dismiss doesn’t dispute the truth that she wantonly disclosed personal and intimate particulars about Matt Kalil that resulted in widespread ridicule and undesirable consideration. The movement fully misses the purpose {that a} partner doesn’t have a proper to show personal and confidential marital and sexual particulars for the aim of profiting. We anticipate that the movement will likely be fully denied.”
A decide has but to decide.
“I might assume either side have sturdy incentives to settle and never let this go to trial,” Bennett tells Us Weekly. “I don’t assume both of them would wish to take part in a public trial that may drive them to rehash the main points of their former intercourse lives. They’ve been divorced for about 4 years, he’s remarried, this might simply be uncomfortable for everybody. If this had been to settle, I might anticipate that settlement settlement would come with a gag order to forestall any future public disclosures by Haley.”
For a full Legally Us recap, watch the video above.


