CFTC defends prediction market enforcement as states problem platforms

Michael Selig, President Donald Trump’s nominee to function Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee chairman, testifies in a Senate Agriculture Committee listening to on his nomination on Capitol Hill, Nov. 19, 2025.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

The Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee filed an amicus transient in federal court docket on Tuesday to say the company’s proper to implement prediction markets as a substitute of particular person states, in keeping with its new chairman, Michael Selig.

Selig argued in a Monday Wall Road Journal op-ed that the CFTC has at all times had authority over prediction markets and figuring out whether or not the occasion contracts represent playing, as critics allege. Selig famous practically 50 energetic authorized circumstances in opposition to prediction markets and mentioned the CFTC can be stepping in to forestall state encroachment.

“The CFTC will now not sit idly by whereas overzealous state governments undermine the company’s unique jurisdiction over these markets by looking for to determine statewide prohibitions on these thrilling merchandise,” he wrote.

The transfer comes as prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket face authorized challenges in a number of states over occasion contracts. The platforms enable customers to guess on the outcomes of occasions in popular culture, sports activities, leisure and extra.

Critics of prediction markets have argued that the choices quantity to little greater than playing, although Kalshi has defended its platform and argued that it abides by federal laws. Sports activities betting on the prediction platforms has drawn comparisons to legalized sports activities betting within the U.S.

In his first public feedback as CFTC chairman on the finish of January, Selig mentioned he was ready to draft new, clear guidelines to control prediction markets and revisit the company’s guidelines on involvement in federal and circuit court docket circumstances.

“The place jurisdictional questions are at concern, the Fee has the experience and accountability to defend its unique jurisdiction over commodity derivatives,” he mentioned on the time.

In his Monday op-ed, Selig mentioned occasion contracts “serve authentic financial features” and function beneath CFTC guidelines as “swaps” relatively than playing. He additionally posited that buying and selling on occasion contracts is useful for the market and for Individuals at giant.

“These exchanges aren’t the Wild West, as some critics declare, however self-regulatory organizations which are examined and supervised by skilled CFTC workers,” Selig wrote.

In a Tuesday video posted to X, Selig mentioned his message to those that problem the CFTC’s authority is obvious: “We’ll see you in court docket.”

“Immediately, the CFTC is taking an vital step to make sure that these markets have a spot right here in America and have the integrity and resilience and vibrancy that our by-product markets deserve,” he mentioned.

Selig mentioned the amicus transient can be filed within the Ninth U.S. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals in help of Crypto.com in its dispute with the Nevada Gaming Management Board.

CNBC couldn’t confirm that the amicus transient had been filed.

Disclosure: CNBC and Kalshi have a industrial relationship that features a CNBC minority funding.



Supply hyperlink

Leave a Comment

Discover more from Education for All

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading